Headline: TRUTH
DETECTOR OR MAN BEHIND REIGN OF ERROR?
Reporter: By Gregory Freeman
Publication: ST.
LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
Last Printed: Fri., July 1, 1994
Section: WAR PAGE, Page: 13E, Edition: FIVE STAR
THE BAD BOYS OF
KMOX - Kevin Horrigan and Charlie Brennan - scored a coup last week when they
landed an interview with President Bill Clinton, who lit into talk show host
Rush Limbaugh.
On
the program, the president asked for fairness by conservative talk show hosts.
He asked for a willingness to present the entire picture, not just their points
of view.
At one point, the president remarked: "After I get off the
radio today with you, Rush Limbaugh will have three hours to say whatever he
wants. And I won't have any opportunity to respond. And there's no truth detector."
Limbaughpounced
on the president's remarks.
"The
gauntlet has been thrown, " Limbaugh said. "There is no need for a
truth detector. I am the truth detector."
But Limbaugh's
"truth detector" must be out of whack. Fairness & Accuracy In
Reporting, a media watchdog group known as FAIR, issued a report earlier this
week, contending that Limbaugh's broadcasts and publications amount to a "reign
of error."
The
organization compiled dozens of Limbaugh's statements and writings that it said
were inaccurate.
Some examples:
The list of Limbaugh errors goes on and on. "From AIDS to ozone, from Whitewater to the Bible, Limbaugh seems to be able to dissemble and disinform on virtually any subject, " FAIR said.
By the way, when
approached by The Associated Press, Limbaugh did not deny saying or writing
the statements attributed to him, nor did he defend their accuracy.
Limbaugh
seems to be perfectly willing to bend the truth to lend credence to the points
he makes. It seems to be a habit with him.
Limbaugh and I don't share political ideologies. The First Amendment guarantees both Rush Limbaugh and me the right to free speech. I listen and watch Limbaugh, just as I'm sure he reads and watches liberal columnists and commentators.
But as a commentator,
Limbaugh needs to aim for accuracy and not twist the truth to make his points.
His talk shows are broadcast on 625 radio stations and 250 TV stations around
the country. He's written two books and publishes a newsletter with 460,000
subscribers.
With that many listeners, viewers and readers, it would seem he
owes his audiences accuracy, at the least.
This is especially so because he pounds the news media regularly
for what he calls incomplete truths.
But I won't be surprised if few Rush fans will actually urge him to be more factual. Limbaugh enjoys the cult of personality. His fans love him, no matter what he says. He's the talk-show equivalent of Ronald Reagan. Reagan said all sorts of wacky things, like blaming trees for pollution. But comments such as that didn't dissuade Reagan's followers.
Limbaugh has that
same talent, that ability to say "pay no attention to that man behind the
curtain, " and have his fans believe him.
That's really
too bad. But when you've got a cult of personality going for you, who really
cares about the truth?
COPYRIGHT © 1994, ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
Daniel Schesch - Webweaver