Headline: TAKE A BITE
OUT OF CRIME NOW
Reporter: By Gregory Freeman
Publication: ST. LOUIS
POST-DISPATCH
Last Printed: Tues., Jan., 11, 1994
Section: WAR PAGE, Page: 9B, Edition: FIVE STAR
TIME FOR a reality check.
That's what I thought as
I saw and read about the three-day summit of black leaders in Washington. The
summit, to push for ways to fight violent crime, was called by Jesse Jackson's
National Rainbow Coalition. In a speech, Jackson called for investment in low-interest
loans to blacks, more jobs and training, less emphasis on building more prisons,
welfare reform, putting more police on the streets and other anti-crime efforts.
Many
of the speakers had good, sound ideas, such as the development of projects that
use public and private funds to build the self-esteem of young men who know
only crime as a means of survival.
But too many, it seemed
to me, ignored or dismissed the other part of the equation: direct efforts to
combat crime.
It's
easy to say things like, "We must act and regain the moral offensive and
set the moral priorities for the country, " a comment Jackson made during
the conference.
But tell that to the woman
who's afraid to leave the house for fear that someone will break in and steal
the few possessions she has.
Or tell
it to the elderly man who's afraid to walk to the corner store because he's
afraid someone will beat him over the head and take his money.
Or tell
it to the parents who worry every time their teen-age son leaves the house -
not because they fear that he will get into some sort of trouble, but because
they are afraid that some idiot will try to shoot him for his coat, his shirt
or his tennis shoes.
These folks don't have
time to hear about the lofty goals. They can't wait until the bad guys decide
to go straight and get legitimate jobs. Their problems are real; crime is swirling
around them every day.
These
are real people. They need help and solutions, and they need them now.
That's not to say that
the ideas discussed at the conference were bad. In fact, many of them were very
good.
Take
the "17-30" venture of Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., for instance.
The program set up a network of counselors in Los Angeles who recruited young
men who spent large amounts of time on street corners, lived with someone on
welfare, sold drugs occasionally or engaged in other unproductive activities.
The counselors signed them up for vocational education and offered a $50 weekly
stipend.
The
counselors taught the young men how America worked - how to get Social Security
cards, drivers licenses and other forms of identification, how to apply for
a job - largely because no one had ever taught them. In fact, they learned to
be citizens.
A program
like that would be valuable in St. Louis.
But while the conference
seemed heavy on crime prevention programs, it seemed astonishingly light on
how to deal with criminals, those on the streets who are creating havoc and
pain.
Participants didn't just ignore corrective measures.
Jackson said his Rainbow Coalition would actively oppose the crime
bills pending in Congress, complaining they focused on police and prisons.
Why eschew proposals for more police or those designed to construct
more jails? Why knock ideas to reform the welfare system if the reforms include
ways to provide jobs for those who now have none? Why criticize proposals that
carry with them an element of personal responsibility?
It strikes
me that many are using the dilemma of crime for political purposes.
With deaths piling up each
day like newspapers on the lawn of a vacant house, it seems to me that we can
little afford to overlook any ideas to curb violence.
If that
means tougher laws and revisions of juvenile codes around the country, so be
it.
If it
means spending more money in urban areas on programs to fight poverty and teach
conflict resolution, so be it as well.
The goal should be to provide
our society with more of a carrot-and-stick approach.
The
carrots - programs to keep people from crime, off the streets and out of poverty
- need to be there.
But
the sticks - stiff sentencing for offenders, additional police and more jail
space - need to be there, too.
Crime
is a multifaceted problem. It calls for multifaceted solutions.
COPYRIGHT © 1994, ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
Daniel Schesch - Webweaver